两岸食品着色剂标准比对研究.pdf

专论综述
中国食品添加剂
China Food Additives
两岸食品着色剂标准比对研究
梁静,黄秀忠!,余满,郑凌君,郑宝东2,曾绍校
(1.福建省标准化硏究院,福州350013
2.福建农林大学食品科学学院,福州350002)
摘要随着两岸经贸往来和人们物质生活水平的提高,两岸的食品贺易和交流将更趋广泛与深入。研
究两岸食品添加剂标准体系必要且迫切。本文通过收集两岸食品添加剂标准及法律法规,对食品着色剂的标
准体系进行比对研究,并根据以上研究成果提出对策和建议,旨在为两岸食品与食品着色剂的生产经营管理
及进出口提供依据。研究表明,两岸着色剂产品名称、允许使用品种、数量、范围和限量差异显著。在着色
剂名称方面,两岸合成着色剂名称除喹啉黄外均不相同:在允许使用品种、范围和限量方面,大陆地区允许
使用的品种多,但允许的范围和限量要求严格;台湾地区允许使用品种少,但对范围和限量宽松,大部分的
着色剂允许适量添加。
关键词:两岸:食品着色剂;标准;对比
中图分类号:TS202.3
文献标识码:A文章编号:1006-2513(2013)03-0191-07
The comparison study on food colorants standard
between Mainland China and Taiwan
LIANG Jing HUANG Xiu-zhong YU Xiao, ZHENG Ling-jun
ZHENG Bao-dong ZENG Shao-xiao
(1. Fujian Institute of Standardization, Fuwhou 350013
2. College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 35000
Abstract: As the living standard improved and the food trading exchanges more widely and deeply between Taiwan and
mainland China, il is nee ssary Lo sludy the di rene e f [ood additive slandard systems bclwecn Iwo arcas. Afler col
lected relevant standards, laws and regulations on food additives, comparative study was carried out and suggestions
were proposed in this paper, The analysis provided Technical reference for production, sale and managcmcnl. The ro
sults showed that the significant difference of food colorants was foud in names, quantity, scope, and limit of usage
The way of naming synthetic colorants is not the same in two areas except quinoline yellow. In the aspect of permitted
usage Types, scopes and limits, mainland China allows more kind of additives, bul with more rigorous scopes and lim-
its while Taiwan allows more flexible application scope and usage limitation, most of the food additives can be used as
production necessary
Key words. cross-slrail, [ood colorants, standards, comparison
颜色是评价食品外观质量的重要指标之
的食欲,增加消戡者的购买欲望。通常情况下,
自然、柔和、令人赏心悦目的颜色可以激起人们我们在食品中加入食品着色剂加以调色,以适应
收稿日期2013-02-16
半通讯作者
基金项目:福建省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项,项目编号20)11R1035-4
作者简介:梁静(1982-),女,工程师,主要从事农业、食品标准化研究
2013年第3期